Why reporters use twitter

The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format. By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. Is Twitter a useful tool for journalists? Journal of Media Practice , 11 2 , Bagdouri, M. Profession-based person search in microblogs: using seed sets to find journalists. Russell, F. Who sets the news agenda on Twitter? Digital Journalism , 3 6 , What journalists retweet: Opinion, humor, and brand development on Twitter.

Journalism , 16 7 , Sheffer, M. Paradigm shift or passing fad? Twitter and sports journalism. International Journal of Sport Communication , 3 4 , Canter, L. Personalised tweeting: The emerging practices of journalists on Twitter. Lee, N. Asian Journal of Communication , 24 3 , Parmelee, J.

Political journalists and Twitter: Influences on norms and practices. Journal of Media Practice , 14 4 , Lawrence, R. Journalism Studies , 15 6 , Lasorsa, D. Transparency and other journalistic norms on Twitter: The role of gender.

Journalism Studies , 13 3 , Small worlds with a difference: New gatekeepers and the filtering of political information on Twitter. In Proceedings of the 3rd international web science conference ACM , p. Journalism Studies , 19 2 , Rogstad, I. Journalism Practice , 8 6 , Broussard, M. Carlson, M. The robotic reporter: Automated journalism and the redefinition of labor, compositional forms, and journalistic authority. Digital Journalism , 3 3 , Montal, T.

I, robot. You, journalist. Who is the author? Authorship, bylines and full disclosure in automated journalism. Digital Journalism , 5 7 , Lewis, S. Libel by algorithm? Automated journalism and the threat of legal liability. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly , 96 1 , Mitchell, A.

State of the news media Pew Research Center , Ju, A. Will social media save newspapers? Pronouncements on Twitter are routinely taken at face value and reproduced in news reports as reliable representations of reality. The total effect of this presentation is to position Twitter nearest to power, thereby signaling to audiences that the platform has authority over news. President Trump exerted a huge influence here, obviously, with about half the stories we analyzed referencing at least one of his tweets.

But even if his Twitter behavior was exceptional, journalists followed only one set of rules, giving all tweets — Trump or not — effectively the same treatment.

We also observed how information from tweets was displayed, noting that journalists variously quoted, paraphrased, and embedded tweets — and sometimes did all of these within a single story. Journalistic standards suggest that sources be interrogated. Content, on the other hand, is simply reproduced, which allows journalists to pass responsibility for content verification on to the original publisher.

Content treatments reproduce information in tweets without visibly questioning its provenance or providing any further evidence of its legitimacy. Journalists overwhelmingly treat tweets as content. This point echoes a longstanding criticism of journalism, but especially political journalism.

When quoting an original source, journalists can maintain their claim on objectivity by accurately quoting that source, with or without verifying the content of the message. While our work refreshes this question, the key finding here is that Twitter takes a central role in brokering news information exchanges. Based on our understanding of journalistic authority, the more audiences see Twitter in this role, the more they associate it with informational authority.

This shift in authority from journalists to Twitter has profound implications for journalism and its role in society. If in addition to this, Twitter exacerbates a journalistic tendency to pass along statements unverified, there are clear drawbacks for the information ecology. Beyond this, Twitter exerting an outsized influence over sourcing and content decisions would compound another longstanding criticism of journalism: that it focuses too heavily on certain voices.

Journalism has traditionally relied on official sources, leading to overrepresentation of powerful white men, thereby producing a skewed view of the world. There are now more opportunities to use social media to find and magnify marginalized voices, which has led to several success stories , including drawing mainstream attention to the Black Lives Matter movement. But even so, those voices are chosen from among a select cast of characters on Twitter: those who are present on the platform and adept at leveraging its affordances to generate attention.

This group is demonstrably different from society as a whole. By influencing who can speak and whether their speech is interrogated before amplification, this shift in journalistic practice dramatically alters public discourse in a way that benefits Twitter, not journalism, not the public — and not democracy. Cite this article Hide citations. Molyneux and Shannon McGregor, Logan. Being on Twitter too much can also put writers in the mindset of assuming their primary audience is other people on Twitter, said Corey Atad, a Toronto-based freelance culture writer who deactivated his account earlier this year.

The introduction of conversation threading in accelerated the pace of Twitter discourse in harmful ways, Atad said. Collins had an experience earlier this year that clarified another positive service Twitter can provide. He emerged from a film screening to the news that acting legend Kirk Douglas had died at the age of Most working journalists in feel compelled to be on Twitter.

Jarvis argues that journalists conversing on Twitter amounts to increasing transparency between the media and the public. Burns, who stopped tweeting and checking his personal account earlier this month, said his bosses at Wired never required him to maintain a personal Twitter account or monitor the platform after hours.

But he sometimes found success writing tweets for the Wired account using memes he had seen while scrolling the app during off hours the night before. For a while, she had fun socializing with people and airing her thoughts. But a few years in, as the contentious presidential election loomed, the fun started to drain out. Bugbee felt obligated to participate in arguments over ephemeral trends and incendiary comments, including some of her own.

One day, something snapped. Bugbee deleted all of her tweets, and stopped checking the app on her phone and computer. Many young journalists are encouraged by professors or internship supervisors to maintain a social media presence to get noticed by editors and hiring managers. A memo this spring from a committee of Washington Post staffers to their editors, shared naturally on Twitter by New York Times media columnist Ben Smith, offers another window into the dynamic:.

Charity worries about the sense of obligation journalists feel to remain on Twitter. He was in college when the practice of offering unpaid newsroom internships was starting to become taboo. That felt encouraging at the time. It feels like a sham to me. Rose Hoban, founder and editor of the online publication North Carolina Health News, said she used to spend an hour a day scrolling and retweeting, at the urging of younger colleagues, in hopes of attracting some eyes to her fledgling publication.

The company has taken steps to address concerns like the ones I heard from journalists while reporting this article. Last week, the company announced a concerted effort to ban users linked to the QAnon conspiracy theory.