Why interpolation is preferable to extrapolation

Options to control the use of IDW include power, search radius, fixed search radius, variable search radius and barrier. Natural neighbor interpolation has many positive features, can be used for both interpolation and extrapolation, and generally works well with clustered scatter points. Another weighted-average method, the basic equation used in natural neighbor interpolation is identical to the one used in IDW interpolation. This method can efficiently handle large input point datasets.

When using the Natural Neighbor method, local coordinates define the amount of influence any scatter point will have on output cells. The Natural Neighbour method is a geometric estimation technique that uses natural neighbourhood regions generated around each point in the data set.

Like IDW, this interpolation method is a weighted-average interpolation method. This method is most appropriate where sample data points are distributed with uneven density. It is a good general-purpose interpolation technique and has the advantage that you do not have to specify parameters such as radius, number of neighbours or weights. This technique is designed to honour local minimum and maximum values in the point file and can be set to limit overshoots of local high values and undershoots of local low values.

The method thereby allows the creation of accurate surface models from data sets that are very sparsely distributed or very linear in spatial distribution. Spline estimates values using a mathematical function that minimizes overall surface curvature, resulting in a smooth surface that passes exactly through the input points.

Conceptually, it is analogous to bending a sheet of rubber to pass through known points while minimizing the total curvature of the surface. It fits a mathematical function to a specified number of nearest input points while passing through the sample points. This method is best for gently varying surfaces, such as elevation, water table heights, or pollution concentrations.

The Spline method of interpolation estimates unknown values by bending a surface through known values. There are two spline methods: regularized and tension. A Regularized method creates a smooth, gradually changing surface with values that may lie outside the sample data range. It incorporates the first derivative slope , second derivative rate of change in slope , and third derivative rate of change in the second derivative into its minimization calculations.

A surface created with Spline interpolation passes through each sample point and may exceed the value range of the sample point set. Although a Tension spline uses only first and second derivatives, it includes more points in the Spline calculations, which usually creates smoother surfaces but increases computation time. This method pulls a surface over the acquired points resulting in a stretched effect. Spline uses curved lines curvilinear Lines method to calculate cell values.

Regularized spline: The higher the weight, the smoother the surface. Weights between 0 and 5 are suitable. Typical values are 0,. Tension spline: The higher the weight, the coarser the surface and more the values conform to the range of sample data. Weight values must be greater than or equal to zero. Typical values are 0, 1, 5, and Kriging is a geostatistical interpolation technique that considers both the distance and the degree of variation between known data points when estimating values in unknown areas.

A kriged estimate is a weighted linear combination of the known sample values around the point to be estimated.

Kriging procedure that generates an estimated surface from a scattered set of points with z-values. Kriging assumes that the distance or direction between sample points reflects a spatial correlation that can be used to explain variation in the surface. The Kriging tool fits a mathematical function to a specified number of points, or all points within a specified radius, to determine the output value for each location.

Kriging is a multistep process; it includes exploratory statistical analysis of the data, variogram modeling, creating the surface, and optionally exploring a variance surface.

Kriging is most appropriate when you know there is a spatially correlated distance or directional bias in the data. It is often used in soil science and geology. The predicted values are derived from the measure of relationship in samples using sophisticated weighted average technique.

It uses a search radius that can be fixed or variable. The generated cell values can exceed value range of samples, and the surface does not pass through samples.

More specifically, given an independent variable, what will the predicted value of the corresponding dependent variable be? The value that we enter for our independent variable will determine whether we are working with extrapolation or interpolation. We could use our function to predict the value of the dependent variable for an independent variable that is in the midst of our data.

In this case, we are performing interpolation. Because our x value is among the range of values used to make the line of best fit, this is an example of interpolation. We could use our function to predict the value of the dependent variable for an independent variable that is outside the range of our data. In this case, we are performing extrapolation. Because our x value is not among the range of values used to make the line of best fit, this is an example of extrapolation.

Of the two methods, interpolation is preferred. This is because we have a greater likelihood of obtaining a valid estimate. When we use extrapolation, we are making the assumption that our observed trend continues for values of x outside the range we used to form our model. This may not be the case, and so we must be very careful when using extrapolation techniques. Actively scan device characteristics for identification.

Use precise geolocation data. Select personalised content. Create a personalised content profile. Measure ad performance. Select basic ads. Ancients who had no good scientific model of the world would not have been far wrong if they forecast that the sun would rise again the next day and the day after that though one day far into the future, even this will fail.

If you were a student who didn't have scientific expertise but wanted a rough, short-term forecast, this would have given you fairly reasonable results. But the farther away from your data you extrapolate, the more likely your prediction is likely to fail, and fail disastrously, as described very nicely in this great thread: What is wrong with extrapolation? Edit based on comments: whether interpolating or extrapolating, it's always best to have some theory to ground expectations.

If theory-free modelling must be done, the risk from interpolation is usually less than that from extrapolation. That said, as the gap between data points increases in magnitude, interpolation also becomes more and more fraught with risk.

In essence interpolation is an operation within the data support , or between existing known data points; extrapolation is beyond the data support. Otherwise put, the criterion is: where are the missing values? One reason for the distinction is that extrapolation is usually more difficult to do well, and even dangerous, statistically if not practically. That is not always true: for example, river floods may overwhelm the means of measuring discharge or even stage vertical level , tearing a hole in the measured record.

In those circumstances, interpolation of discharge or stage is difficult too and being within the data support does not help much. In the long run, qualitative change usually supersedes quantitative change.

Around there was much concern that growth in horse-drawn traffic would swamp cities with mostly unwanted excrement. The exponential in excrement was superseded by the internal combustion engine and its different exponentials. A trend is a trend is a trend, But the question is, will it bend? Will it alter its course Through some unforeseen force And come to a premature end?

Cairncross, A. Economic forecasting. The Economic Journal , FWIW: The prefix inter- means between , and extra- means beyond. Think also of inter state highways which go between states, or extra terrestrials from beyond our planet. Study: Want to fit a simple linear regression on the height on the age for girls of age years old. After data collection, model is fit and get the estimate of intercept b0 and slope b1. When you want the mean height for age 13, you find that there is no 13 year old girl in your sample of girls, one of them is It is called interpolation because 13 year old is covered by the range of your data used to fit model.

If you want to get mean height for age 30 and use that formula, that is called extrapolation, because age 30 is out of the range of the age covered by your data. If the model has several covariates, you need to be careful because it is hard to draw the border that data covered.

The extrapolation v. The author wrote that extrapolation is a wall stopping us reaching artificial general intelligence. Let's suppose that we train a translation model to translate English to German very well with tons of data, we can be sure that it can fail a test with randomly permutated English words because it has never seen such data in the training process and it is certain to fail a new phrase coined after it is trained.

That is it behaves badly for open-ended inferences because it can be only accurat for data similar to the training ones but the real world is open-ended. Sign up to join this community. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top.

Stack Overflow for Teams — Collaborate and share knowledge with a private group.