Who is good except god

When Jesus himself cited the law, he said that these were two laws, and on these two commandments hang all the law and the prophets. And Jesus told this man that he lacked one thing. How would this be solved? Good post. Is there anything to the above explanation? The question is, why were his actions good? Does that make sense? Lord you have never lied, nor stole, nor broken any commandment of God. You are like God, who is perfect. But who can think that fast and have such understanding?

He knows when we are not looking. He knows how to catch men. Name required. Mail hidden required. The views expressed by posters and commentators are not necessarily endorsed by Living Hope International Ministries. Feel free to disagree with us as we all work together to discover the truth of Scripture.

Kingdom Ready promoting the gospel of the kingdom and the creed of Jesus. Something you need to know about Jesus. The rich young man had come to Jesus with a hidden agenda. And Jesus knew it. The man wanted to manipulate Jesus to favor him because of his wealth and status.

You know, some rich people, think money can buy them everything. Jesus saw right through his insincerity. And stopped him in his tracks with this question that must have thrown him off-guard.

Or are you giving me lip-service? Or is it because you want something from me? And if you really believe I am good, then do you also believe that I am God, since only God is good? Neither did He at any time question or correct or rebuke them. Here is what some people miss in this episode. Jesus wanted to teach His disciples and us something. This is why this section of scripture is so profound and so important.

We all need to think about only God being truly and incomparably good, with all sinful humans only being relatively good, from the human point of view. I suggest you will find his rebuke in verses 23 to 25, not verse That agrees with a similar warning Jesus gave to religious people who loved money and who despised him. Read Luke about a rich man there.

In summary, Jesus answered that man as he did to stop him in his tracks. The young man was going along the lines of legalism in order to inherit eternal life as if doing A, B, and C would entitle him to inherit. But by not admitting that he was imperfect, and that his failure to totally keep that law showed him to be a sinner who could never merit eternal life by perfectly keeping that law, he had up till then missed the point of the law of God. Jesus was helping him see the point.

And, Jesus being the exception to that fact, should cause us to consider how he was the only human to fulfil the law, therefore Jesus WAS truly good. Finally, by telling the man to sell up, give to the poor and then to follow him, Jesus was showing up one of the biggest barriers to entering into the kingdom of God — love of money.

Mark 10 ESV. Had the man been present when Jesus taught, the "rebuke" is because he wants something more to inherit eternal life: " Good teacher what [more] must I do to inherit eternal life? If the man had been present, a more reasonable question might be, "Good teacher, how can I [a grown man] come to you like a child? The simple way to reconcile what Jesus said with the use elsewhere, is to preserve the character of the word, which is an adjective, not a noun. In other words, " Why do you call me good [teacher].

No one is good [teacher] except God alone. Even if the implied sense of "teacher" is discounted, the adjective lacks a noun or pronoun and in that way what Jesus said cannot be used to claim an exclusive application of "good" to God: as the other uses in Scripture show. If the implied "teacher" is presumed, then the sense of what Jesus says takes on additional significance.

Again, had the man been present for the earlier message, Jesus rebuke is not about the word "good" but in the application of the word to teacher. That is, if the use of adjective means only God is a good teacher why do you call me "good teacher? He no longer calls Jesus "good" and while the pericope ends with the man leaving because of his unwillingness to sell his possessions, the overarching issue is his unwillingness to insist Jesus is in fact "good" and come to Him as a child.

At Mark the man first addresses Jesus as "Good Teacher, and ask, "what shall I do to inherit eternal life? The man's understanding of "good" was achievement, but Jesus turned his attention toward God, the author and true standard of all that is morally good. How do I know this? By reading Matthew At verse Jesus explains to the man which commandments should he keep? At verse 20 the man said all of them. At verse 21 Jesus says if you want to be complete sell your possessions and give them to the poor etc.

Now comes the "heart" pun intended of the matter. The man was unwilling to part with his "stuff" and was grieved about it. The man had asked the question on the basis of works, "What must I do? If you are not God, then you are not good. Sign up to join this community. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top.

Stack Overflow for Teams — Collaborate and share knowledge with a private group. Create a free Team What is Teams? Learn more. Why does Jesus rebuke the young man? Mark Ask Question. Asked 7 months ago. Active 1 month ago. Viewed times. Why did he answer the young man as he did? Improve this question. Dottard Ozzie Ozzie Ozzie Ozzie Some suggest that Jesus is denying He is God. Others think that Jesus is trying to reveal to the man that He is God. But Jesus isn't directly commenting on the sentiment expressed in the statement.

Rather, He's prompting the man to consider who deserves to be called "good. What characterizes someone as "good"? And if someone were completely good, what would that say about them?